This article is taken from a magazine I subscribe to online:
Fab Over 50 ... describes me perfectly, nooo? ;)
Yennyways, here's the thing: Since moving to PD, I've found that I've put on a lot of weight, and most of it in my stomach/belly and bum. It is really depressing, and even more so because here is where I've exercised the most, and most consistently. I've actually gotten off my bum and gotten on my exercise machine (my elliptical trainer) and worked from 45 minutes (up to an hour on good days,when I feel strong and well), on it for at least five days a week. PLUS, Dan got me these resistance-band thingies to build muscle, and I include them in my exercise routine. And yet, I have not moved an ounce - let alone built muscle or have my tummy shrink - and when I weighed myself, I was even heavier than before I moved here.
And NO, I don't eat chocolates on a regular basis. And NO, I don't drink (arak lah ;) regularly. Both are once-in-a-blue-moon indulgences.
So, when I found this article below, today, I realised that the ONE thing that is different between being in KL and in PD is this: I eat a LOT more bread. Chuan bakes beautiful bread, and we eat breakfast together every day. And no, we don't eat a loaf each - it is like the article says: 2 slices. It is not super-rich bread, and neither is it full of raisins and nuts and other stuff. Just ordinary, good bread, that's super delicious, because it is homemade, and doesn't have the additives and whatnots that you'd find in Gardenia and High5 and the other stuff on the shelves.
And I read this article, and I think, this may be the answer to why I am not doing well at all. It won't be hard, but I'm going to cut out wheat from my diet for the next six months. I don't know if it'll move mountains, but if it does, I'll report back here.
I no longer feel the need to be stick-thin to feel good. I just need to feel and simply be healthy. Putting on all that weight in my tummy area is depressing; but, it also has aggravated my acid-reflux problem, which I was told gets worse when there is increased fat around the stomach area. Sounds icky when you put it like that, but that is the way it is.
I've always felt that a Low Glycemic Index diet was the best way to go, and I've tried to stay true to that. Ever since my dad developed diabetes in his late sixties, I read up on it and it is sound theory: control your body's insulin response, and you prevent a whole host of ailments.
That's why this article below struck such a chord in me. I almost didn't read it, because I thought it would be about some new-fangled exercise routine, or some new gimmicky machine that someone wanted to sell.
And then I found this man speaking words that resonated with me. I think he makes perfect sense. I hope it makes a difference for me.
Do you have a 'wheat belly'?
(Find the original article here.)Posted on November 16, 2011
Cardiologist William Davis, MD, started his career repairing damaged hearts through surgical angioplasty and stents. “That’s what I was trained to do, and at first, that’s what I wanted to do,” he explains. But when his own mother died of a heart attack in 1995, despite receiving the best cardiac care, he was forced to face nagging concerns about his profession.
“I realized how silly it was,” he says. “I’d fix a patient’s heart, only to see her come back, and back and back with the same problems. It was just a band-aid, with no effort to identify the cause of the disease.”
So he sailed his practice toward highly uncharted medical territory--prevention--and spent the next 15 years examining the causes of heart disease in his own patients. The resulting discoveries are revealed in Wheat Belly, his New York Times best-selling book, which attributes many of our nation’s physical problems, including heart disease, diabetes and obesity, to our consumption of wheat.
He spoke to us this week about how exactly eliminating wheat can "transform our lives."
First of all, what is a “wheat belly”?
I make a lot of arguments about the dangers of wheat, one of which is that it raises your blood sugar dramatically. In fact, two slices of wheat bread raise your blood sugar more than a Snickers bar. Anything that raises blood sugar to a high level will cause accumulation of abdominal fat. We’re not quite sure why high blood sugar leads to belly fat accumulation, but it does. When my patients give up wheat, I see that weight loss is substantial, especially from the abdomen. People can lose several inches in the first month.
You make connections in the book between wheat and a host of other health problems. How did you come up with this theory?
Eighty percent of my patients had diabetes or pre-diabetes. I knew that wheat spiked blood sugar more than almost anything else, so I started to say, “Let’s remove wheat from your diet and see what happens to your blood sugar.” They’d come back 3 to 6 months later, and their blood sugar would be dramatically reduced. But they also had all these other reactions: “I did this, and I lost 38 pounds.” Or, “my asthma got so much better, I threw away two of my inhalers.” Or “the migraine headaches I’ve had every day for 20 years stopped within three days.” “My acid reflux is now gone.” “My IBS is better, my ulcerative colitis, my rheumatoid arthritis, my mood, my sleep . . .” and so on, and so on.
So what is it about wheat that you think causes all these problems?
When you look at the makeup of wheat, it’s almost like a group of evil scientists got together and said, how can we create this god-awful destructive food that will ruin health?
First, amylopectin A, a chemical unique to wheat, is an incredible trigger of small LDL particles in the blood--the number one cause of heart disease on the United States. When wheat is removed from the diet, these small LDL levels plummet by 80 and 90 percent.
I typically think of a “hearth-healthy” diet as one that is low in fat and high in whole grains.
That has been the common wisdom for the last 15 years or so, and in that time we’ve seen an explosion in the rates of small LDL cholesterol, obesity and heart disease in this country. We’ve had a situation where the national advice--to cut fat and eat more whole grains--is advocating a diet that causes heart disease.
You also talk about the “addictive” properties of wheat.
Wheat contains high levels of gliadin, a protein that actually stimulates appetite. Eating wheat increases the average person’s calorie intake by 400 calories a day.
Gliadin also has opiate-like properties in the brain, so it’s not surprising that when some people remove wheat from their diets, they literally go through a period of withdrawal where they feel terrible. Food scientists have known this for 20 years, and they’ve used it to their advantage. If you go up and down the supermarket shelves, you’re going to see wheat flour in the most improbable places---everywhere from Campbell’s soup to granola bars.
Is eating a wheat-free diet the same as a gluten-free diet? I know that’s a major trend right now.
Gluten has negative, inflammatory properties, but it is just one component of wheat. In other words, if I took the gluten out of it, wheat will still be terrible for you since it will still have the Gliadin and the amylopectin A, as well as several other undesirable components.
So you don’t advocate all the “gluten free” products I see at the grocery store.
Unfortunately, when it comes to health, the food industry does not normally know what they’re doing. They’ve come out with all these foods that are gluten free: gluten-free multi-grain bread, gluten-free bagels, etc. Those are made with 4 basic ingredients: corn starch, rice starch, tapioca starch or potato starch. And those 4 dried, powdered starches are some of the very few foods that raise blood sugar even higher than wheat does!
Sounds like all the “fat free” foods that came out 10-15 years ago. People thought “these cookies are good for me because they don’t have fat.”
Perfect analogy. Yes, it’s the same kind of blunder. Just because it lacks one thing doesn’t make it good.
Is there any bread or wheat that’s okay to eat? What about the the health breads and the sprouted breads?
No. They still retain too much of the adverse wheat compounds--leptins, amylopectin A, gluten and gliadin. You might reduce the amount of some of the compounds, but they’re still there.
So what can you eat?!
I encourage people to return to real food: vegetables and nuts, cheese and eggs and meats in all forms, avocados and olives. Get rid of the “low-fat” notion. It’s not necessarily a diet of deprivation. I’ve been doing this for many years myself, and I’ve had cookies and cheesecake, carrot cake, chocolate biscotti--but it means recreating these food using different ingredients. I have recipes in the back of my book as well as on my wheat belly blog.
You advocate real food, but isn’t wheat a “real food?” People have been eating it for thousands of years, why is it suddenly such a problem?
Wheat really changed in the 70s and 80s due to a series of techniques used to increase yield, including hybridization and back crossings. It was bred to be shorter and sturdier and also to have more gliadin, a potent appetite stimulate. The wheat we eat today is not the wheat that was eaten 100 years ago. Wheat has also become a much more central part of the American diet.
What if I remove the wheat, but I’m still eating carbohydrates? So, for example, I stop eating my sandwich every day, and I start eating rice with chicken and vegetables. Will I still have the health benefits? Will I still lose weight?
Most do, yes. Because rice doesn’t raise blood sugar as high as wheat, and it also doesn’t have the amylopectin A or the gliadin that stimulates appetite. You won’t have the same increase in calorie intake that wheat causes. That’s part of the reason why foreign cultures that don’t consume wheat tend to be slenderer and healthier.
Does everyone need to stop eating wheat, or are some people more at risk for these problems than others?
If you ask me, everyone should stop eating wheat. This is the closest I know of to something that will transform your life. There are very few people who don’t have some physical issue that can be helped by this. The physical reach is so far and so wide, that I’m shocked when someone comes back to me and says, “I did it and nothing happened.”
Does that happen?
Very uncommon. Very, very uncommon.
Friday, November 18, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Sometimes, you'll find me here:
-
-
Sunday, 1 April2 months ago
Better than cnn ;)
-
-
Selangor tops unregistered voters list2 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Great Debate3 days ago
-
-
-
Tweet nonsense1 week ago
-
My must reads!
-
Front Door14 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
Maria Emmerich visits Wheat Belly3 days ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
Kelp Noodles1 week ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
choral Speaking Competition1 month ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
On the move4 months ago
-
Gayo Ngaran – A short story10 months ago
-
-
About Me
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(64)
-
►
April
(13)
- 'Cleaning in progress'
- This is a story about farting . . .
- The Khan Academy
- I won't give up: Jason Mraz
- ONLY in Malaysia
- PUSH to add drama
- A M A Z I N G art
- I should learn to do this . . .
- It's really only in your mind, dear
- Illusion
- Feeling stupid? Well, maybe this will make you fee...
- The hypnotist
- Don't be late!!!
-
►
February
(16)
- Take the bus!
- 'The English Language in 24 accents'
- Mathai slays Adele!
- '500 Years of Female Portraits in Western Art'
- New Cuyama*
- How to sharpen your knife with a cup
- Windsong in the February sun
- Jordis Unga
- Whitney Houston: 1963 - 2012
- Almond hearts
- Happy Valentine's Day :)
- A song for you
- If you stare at this picture long enough . . .
- A new Nile virus!
- Yes, there's an echo in here:AmplifiedMedia.org
- There comes a time when a woman just has to trust ...
-
►
April
(13)


I feel good now that I eat rice and not bread! But I love cakes :(
ReplyDeleteHiya Lily,
ReplyDeleteI love cakes, too :(
And because I am taking this seriously, and want to give it a try to alleviate some of the symptoms that I have, I have been seriously looking at what I eat, and trying to figure out how much of it is actually wheat.
Bread is the tip of my iceberg. I have found wheat in so many things, that I will have to think of alternatives that work before I can even start. I don't think there will be any point to doing it half-heartedly, or in a hit-or-miss way.
About that cake: I have found lovely chocolate cake recipes with almonds instead of flour. When I am going well on this wheat-free diet, I'll post some recipes that work, k ;)
Seems to me like everything that gives us pleasure is now bad for us. I think it is the stress of modern life -- being bombarded with info 24-7, being alerted to all sorts of threats no matter how remote, having to sit in air-conditioned rooms and drive everywhere -- that's actually killing us. 50 years ago if anyone even suggested that bread is bad for you, we would have had them committed to a mental institution. My parents' time, bread was almost a luxury. Butter was something only rich people had. Having rice on the table was something to be grateful for. Meat was something they got twice a year -- on CNY and during Winter Solstice. Nobody grew fat on bread even if they could afford to eat a loaf a day. Our bodies didn't respond the same way to food back then, as they do now, because our immune systems weren't so suppressed and damaged by all the stress accumulated from years of urban, modern life.
ReplyDeleteWhile I agree with most of what you say, E, I think the case against wheat makes sense. At least, for me.
ReplyDeleteI have had problems digesting bread (and later cakes, biscuits, pizza, spaghetti)for a long time, but I never could pin-point just what the problem was. I felt it was wheat, or maybe the yeast, or maybe the combo of wheat/butter/sugar, or the combo of wheat/tomato/onion. I never knew just what was upsetting my stomach - literally - and making my reflux problem so bad.
Now, I will try this, and see if there is any improvement - because I don't want to be taking medication that often doesn't work.
ALSO: The wheat we ate 50 years ago caused no problems - because it was very different from the wheat we all eat today. Genetic modification of wheat now, makes the the original bread that was broken among friends for eons very different from what we eat today.
I have been reading up on wheat, and on the GM of wheat and other cereals like corn, and my reading is taking me to sad places. It would seem that all this mass production and genetic modification of stuff is only to make them more profitable, and easier to harvest - not more nutritious or better for us.
So while food was good, even say, 50-odd years ago, it is no longer true of the same food today.
The world is changing. And sadly, not always for the better.
I'll let you know how my wheat-is-out diet goes. I start on 1 December.